Seems Resonable to me...

from our friend Gordon over at ScrewHoo...

"PUBLIC FOREVER" RESOLUTION GOES TO BUNCOMBE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Group Calls For Investigation of Parkside Deal and
Reacquisition of Public Land

Though widely acknowledged to have been a mistake, the
sale of public park land to a private developer has
neither been investigated nor has the County
government corrected its error through reacquisition
of the land in question. The process that allowed
this failure of government to take place must be
publicly examined and corrected to ensure the people
of Asheville and Buncombe County can have full faith
and confidence in their elected government.

George W. Pack gave Pack Square to County residents in
1900 "provided that the County will dedicate to the
Public forever, to be used for the purpose of a public
square, park or place". While Stewart Coleman's Black
Dog Realty fights the Pack family in the courts,
ordinary citizens are left wondering how their
government could have allowed the sale to happen.

Asheville Buncombe Policy Institute, in the spirit of
open government and honoring the legacy of George W.
Pack, put forth the "Public Forever" resolution on May
12, 2008 asking that County Commissioners shoulder the
responsibility of (1) determining the cause and remedy
for the failures that led to the sale; and (2)
reacquiring the park land in order to return it to the
public.

The private developers continue to move ahead with
their project, slated to come before City Council in
June, 2008, despite being rejected by the Asheville
Planning and Zoning Board and being opposed by the
Pack Square Conservancy, the ostensible stewards of
the park.

That which George W. Pack insisted remain "Public
forever" is in danger of being forever lost. Our
County government has a moral and ethical obligation
to its citizens to investigate and rectify this
transaction.

Through a full accounting of the error(s) and through
rectifying the errant transaction, our County's
government will demonstrate its openness, commitment
to quality, and willingness to say that "public
forever" means public forever.

# # #

If you'd like more information about this topic, or to
schedule an interview with Gordon Smith of A/B Pi,
please contact him at 828/279-2551 or email Gordon at
scrutinyhooligans@yahoo.com
-----

"Public Forever" Resolution. Submitted by the
Asheville/Buncombe Policy Institute to the Buncombe
County Board of Commissioners on May 12, 2008:

WHEREAS the Buncombe County Board of Commissioners on
January 7, 1901 recorded in the minutes an offer from
George Pack, which was accepted by the Commissioners,
"I offer to give to the County to be used for a site
for a Coach House and County offices, the land on
College Street in Asheville, which I purchased of Col.
A.J. Davidson, provided that the County will dedicate
to the Public forever, to be used for the purpose of a
public square, park or place".

WHEREAS Buncombe County acknowledged that parcel
9649.19-50-0341 (otherwise known as park land in front
of City Hall) fell within the Pack Square boundaries
in an August 14, 2001 agreement between the City of
Asheville, County of Buncombe, and the Pack Square
Conservancy;

WHEREAS it has been publicly acknowledged that the
County sold Parcel 9649.19-50-0341, which was included
in the August 14, 2001 agreement that Buncombe County
signed with Pack Square Conservancy, is public
parkland;

WHEREAS this sale was advertised for only one day in a
small, classified advertisement;

WHEREAS that sale was inserted into a consent agenda
moments before voting on it without any public notice
and summarily passed;

WHEREAS the sale of such land requires a public
process, requests for qualifications, etc.;

WHEREAS Builder Stewart Coleman began research to
acquire this parcel before it was for sale;

WHEREAS Builder Stewart Coleman held private meetings
with former City Planning Director about acquiring the
park land for a year before doing so;

WHEREAS these discussions, per Mr. Coleman, involved
swapping City-owned land for Parcel 9649.19-50-0341;

WHEREAS the parcel was sold for $278,000 below the
value later assigned to it by the County;

WHEREAS Wanda Greene's signature is on the August 14,
2001 agreement with Pack Square Conservancy, promising
that parcel to them for the park, but she then
advocated for the sale of the parkland when Stewart
Coleman approached the County about buying the old
jail;

WHEREAS Commissioners Peterson and Stanley have stated
that the deal might have been a mistake;

WHEREAS Commissioner Gantt has stated, "We screwed up"
and "Everybody failed." in regard to the sale of the
property;

WHEREAS the Register of Deeds office possesses an
aerial photo with a map overlay that clearly shows the
proposed sale's property line extending well into the
park;

WHEREAS, according to Commissioners, no one in County
staff alerted the Commissioners to the fact that the
land is in Pack Square;

WHEREAS this would have required failures at every
level of County staff;

WHEREAS public trust and public confidence are central
to our democracy;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the parcel be reacquired
and returned to its intended purpose as stated in the
Pack Square Agreement signed by parties representing
the City of Asheville, the County of Buncombe, and
Pack Conservancy on August 14, 2001.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THEREFORE that the
Commissioners or an independent organization will
initiate, complete, and make public an investigation
into the causes of the various failures that allowed
this sale of public park to a private developer to
take place and that this investigation will be
completed by August 15, 2008.

SAIC and the shadow government--Part II

This is the second part of a post based on a Vanity Fair Article called Washington's 8-Billion-Dollar Shadow which is a long, but good read.

Now, in part I we learned that

• SAIC stands for Science Applications International Corporation
• They are possibly the largest US federal contractor
• They have friends in high places
• Many times their work is substandard
• They were instrumental in the lies which led to the Iraq War
• They see the "Global War (on some) Terror" as a great revenue stream

and

• they are really, really good at getting contracts

So, now. On to today. We left off with outrage about their role in the run-up to the Iraq War.

Remember David Kay from the first few months of the war? Yes, he was the guy who confirmed that Saddam had no WMD after all.

Let's go back then to 1998 when, well from the article...

It is Wednesday afternoon, March 25, 1998, and David A. Kay, who had been a U.N. official in Iraq in the aftermath of the 1991 Gulf War, is on Capitol Hill testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee. Americans generally remember Kay as the head of the Iraq Survey Group, the man who showed that Saddam Hussein didn't possess W.M.D. when America invaded in 2003, and that the war was launched under false pretenses. But today, in 1998, he is not David Kay, weapons inspector, but David Kay, director of SAIC's Center for Counterterrorism Technology and Analysis. He is a stockholder in a company known to cognoscenti in the hearing room as a fraternal twin of the intelligence establishment. With great authority, Kay tells the committee that Saddam Hussein "remains in power with weapons of mass destruction" and that "military action is needed." He warns that unless America acts now "we're going to find the world's greatest military with its hands tied."

Wonder when PNAC sent the letter to President Clinton urging action on Iraq? Yep, January, 1998. Coincidence? I was taught in the Marine Corps there is no such thing as coincidence in intelligence operations, and this clearly was one.

So, David Kay had to come clean about the WMD after the 2003 invasion, it had to be him, so his groundwork could be sanitized. "Go forth and sin no more," said Congress. Even as late as October, 2002 Dr. Kay told NBC News, "I don't think it's possible to disarm Iraq as long as Saddam is in power and desires to maintain weapons of mass destruction."

Wonder if that quote came from the Vice President's office? Or SAIC HQ? Or PNAC?

Let's go back to the timeline... from the article...

I

t was understood in Washington, long before the actual onset of "shock and awe," that the Iraq war would be a Klondike gold rush for contractors. Prior to the war, SAIC was awarded seven contracts, together worth more than $100 million, without competitive bidding. The Defense Department's justification for the no-bid contracts: "We need the immediate services of a fully qualified contractor who has the unqualified support and confidence of the Pentagon leadership." SAIC's personnel, designated "subject-matter experts," were expected to lend a hand on such matters as "business development, international and regional political relations, the role of women in government, and government reform." Among SAIC's subject-matter experts was Shaha Riza, an Arab feminist and communications adviser at the World Bank. Riza also happened to be the girlfriend of Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy secretary of defense.

Wow. The most amazing thing in this bit is that Paul Wolfowitz actually HAD a girlfriend. I have always pictured him as more of a bestiality freak or flagallant of some kind. But I digress. Of course we have seen what a wonderful job SAIC has done restoring Iraq's infrastructure. I think people there are up to 4 hours of electricity a day, and most days can get drinking water from somewhere in their neighborhood, sometimes even without being targeted by US snipers or aircraft while doing so.

SAIC also was responsible for what has become an anti-American Shiite television network. After their complete mis-management and bungling, it was turned over to Iraqis who immediately made it into a great propaganda tool.

Good work boys. But wait, there is more.

Tomorrow, part III

Through the looking glass again

The NY Times says...

Deadliest Bomb in Iraq Is Made by Iran, U.S. Says

by (get this) link to article... for what it is worth

Michael R. Gordon

Yes, the same one who worked with Judith Miller to spread propaganda about Iraq in 2002 and 2003. The same "reporter" who released the story about the dreaded Aluminum Tubes and the re-starting of the late Saddam Hussein's WMD program.

And the Times goes with this guy? Seriously, this is nutty. Flip back through this guys headlines, here... they read like White House wet dream press releases.

AND HE IS STILL DOING IT

Look for a spring launch of whatever it is they will call the war on Iran.

From the article... random quotes... "broad agreement among American intelligence agencies, although officials acknowledge that the picture is not entirely complete"

Hmmmm. Where have we heard this before? And what about those who do not agree? Are they quoted?

Well, surprise, surprise, surprise, as Gomer Pyle would have said.

No.

We are just supposed to trust this report from this guy.

Not me. How about you?